Lib­er­als detest Amer­ica.   Let me be more spe­cific:  Lib­er­als detest cap­i­tal­ist, rep­re­sen­ta­tive repub­lic Amer­ica.  The lib­eral agenda is two-fold:  First, destroy the cap­i­tal­ist eco­nomic sys­tem that has served our coun­try greatly the past two hun­dred and thirty-five years; Sec­ond, destroy the rep­re­sen­ta­tive repub­lic that our found­ing fathers fought, bled, and died for.

Why would they do this?  It’s sim­ple.  The want to insti­tute their own vision of Amer­ica – a social­ist utopia where all are rich, every­thing is free, and the work­ing class rules.  Sounds great, right?  Let’s look at this in some detail.

Gina Miller, a local jour­nal­ist and audio blog­ger, had a won­der­ful piece this morn­ing on a local news talk radio sta­tion, News­Ra­dio 104.9 FM.   She does a won­der­ful job explain­ing just how deranged and non­sen­si­cal the Com­mu­nist Party USA’s agenda is.  I just want to present you with some quotes as an exam­ple of how far out in left field these peo­ple are.

This past Sun­day morn­ing on “This Week”, Cokie Roberts of ABC News said the fol­low­ing:

 This group of peo­ple in New York [Stan­dard and Poor’s] is actu­ally talk­ing about more gov­ern­ment rather than less gov­ern­ment, Con­gress­man. In fact, the rea­son they like France and Great Britain is because they’re par­lia­men­tary sys­tems where the major­ity gets what it wants no mat­ter what.

And the prob­lem that we have here is the Con­sti­tu­tion of the United States of Amer­ica which actu­ally does require peo­ple to come together from dif­fer­ent per­spec­tives whether it’s divided gov­ern­ment or not. We have divided branches of gov­ern­ment under any circumstance.

As Noël Shep­pard said in his arti­cle, WOW!  You can’t get more plain and straight to the point than that.

It is quite clear that lib­er­als detest the checks and bal­ances sys­tem of our gov­ern­ment, espe­cially when they don’t “own” all three branches.  They would like to see noth­ing more than a Stal­in­ist style of gov­ern­ment, where every­thing is owned by those in power – i.e., them.   What they fail to see, or per­haps can’t see, is that in every coun­try where socialism/communism has been imple­mented, total ruin has fol­lowed.  Per­haps that is what they ulti­mately want.  Per­haps they are so hate-filled they would rather bring the great­est coun­try in the world to her knees just to snuff out the last bas­tion of cap­i­tal­ism and democracy.

This is why we must be vig­i­lant daily to fight for our coun­try and our rights under the Con­sti­tu­tion.  Lib­er­als will stop at noth­ing to destroy our way of life, and they will vil­ify any­one who gets in their way.  The great­est exam­ple of this has been the past week’s debt debate.

The “talk­ing points” from the left for the past week and a half has been how the “Tea Party” has been “hold­ing hostage” the gov­ern­ment.  Every­one from Vice Pres­i­dent Joe Biden to Howard Dean, the head of the DNC, has called “Tea Party” mem­bers “ter­ror­ists” and “hostage tak­ers”.  A “jour­nal­ist” (if you can call him that), Fareed Zakaria of Time and CNN said the following:

So, instead of accept­ing some com­pro­mise that can get through the demo­c­ra­tic process, what they’re say­ing is we’ll blow up the coun­try if you don’t lis­ten to us. We’ll hold hostage the credit of the United States, the good stand­ing of the United States and we’ll blow it up.

They have also been say­ing how the credit rat­ing down­grade by Stan­dard & Poor’s is the “Tea Party” down­grade.  How is that so when the Democ­rats hold the Sen­ate and the White House?  And where is the civil­ity in rhetoric that they called for ear­lier this year?

I will not sit idly by and watch those in power try to destroy this coun­try.  I urge all of you to get out there and edu­cate those you know as to what is going on.  Let’s take this coun­try back from those who would seek to destroy it.  I will leave you with two quotes:

 Think what you do when you run into debt; you give another power over your liberty.

I am for doing good to the poor, but I dif­fer in opin­ion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not mak­ing them easy in poverty, but lead­ing or dri­ving them out of it. In my youth I trav­elled much, and I observed in dif­fer­ent coun­tries, that the more pub­lic pro­vi­sions were made for the poor, the less they pro­vided for them­selves, and of course became poorer. And, on the con­trary, the less was done for them, the more they did for them­selves, and became richer.

–Ben­jamin Franklin