Facebook and Warcraft

If you’re on Face­book, you’ve prob­a­bly seen all the lat­est changes to the lay­out.  Why did it change?  What was so wrong with the way things were? Frankly, it has annoyed me beyond my usual annoy­ance level with Face­book.  I have kept my account open and active, sim­ply so I can com­mu­ni­cate with fam­ily and friends that I hardly get to see.

Face­book games — like Mafia Wars, Far­mville, Farkle, and such — are a big rea­son a lot of peo­ple are on there.  I sim­ply don’t like them.  I am fur­ther annoyed by all the “requests” that are sent to me by my con­tacts — even though I don’t play the games.  I’ve had enough of it.

From now on, if you send me a game request in Face­book, it’s get­ting ignored.  I don’t play Mafia Wars.  I don’t play Far­mville.  I don’t play Yoville.  I don’t play Farkle (any­more).  The only rea­son I’m on Face­book is so I can com­mu­ni­cate with those I don’t see day to day.  If you don’t want to do that, that’s fine.  Just leave me alone with the game requests, please, and thank you!

Upcom­ing Posts

I have decided to fold other top­ics into this blog besides pol­i­tics.  Frankly, I’m sick of pol­i­tics and all the goings on in our nation’s cap­i­tal.  I still try to keep up with the lat­est news, but it just con­tin­ues to sicken me how cor­rupt our whole sys­tem is.  The bureau­crats on both sides just make my blood boil.  As each day passes, I wish we could just fire them all and start fresh.  After all, they do work for us, right?

If you’ve vis­ited in the last cou­ple of days, you’ll see that I added a “wid­get” to my side­bar, show­ing my char­ac­ter armory from World of War­craft.  Now, that game is my addic­tion.  It’s pretty much what I do when I get home from work (if “Lost” or “24” is not on, that is).  I guess that’s what I do instead of play­ing those annoy­ing Face­book games.  And that is one topic I plan on blog­ging more about here.

Why do I play?

You’re prob­a­bly won­der­ing why on Earth I would play such a game.  What makes it so addic­tive and fun?  Well, I think for me it’s the “solv­ing puz­zles” aspect of the game.  There are quests you can do in the game, as well as what’s called “instances” or “dun­geons”, where you and four other peo­ple go in and defeat “bosses” (just think Mario or Zelda here).  There’s also larger dun­geons, called “raids”, where you can get with nine or twenty-four other peo­ple and go in to defeat even more dif­fi­cult “bosses”.

In order to beat these bosses, you have to fol­low a cer­tain strat­egy or solve a cer­tain puz­zle.  It takes coör­di­na­tion, plan­ning, and team­work.  And it’s fun!  I think that is the biggest draw for me to the game.

The big “raid” right now is called Ice­crown Citadel, which is the home of the Lich King.  For all you “Lord of the Rings” fans out there, think Sauron and Mor­dor and you pretty much have what the citadel looks like.  I’m also a big com­puter graph­ics nerd, so going in and see­ing the archi­tec­ture of this place is just amaz­ing.  The onyx-looking stone that com­prises the floor and walls, the gothic design of the arch­ways and walk­ways in the citadel, and the air­ship bat­tle mid­way through the Lower Spire are just some of the awe-inspiring sights of this game.  I guess I also love the lore and story behind it:  I’m a HUGE Tolkien fan and this is pretty much like march­ing to the Black Gate to face Sauron and his orcs.

Only in WoW, you’re fac­ing the Lich King and his Scourge — the undead min­ions.  Instead of watch­ing it unfold on the big screen or see­ing it unfold in your mind, you’re help­ing things along and inter­act­ing with some of the major char­ac­ters in the story.  It’s you and your friends who are the heroes in this epic battle.

So that’s why I play.

No Twitter for You!

Appar­ently that’s what Biz Stone, co-founder of the most pop­u­lar microblog­ging site (which I use, by the way), said.  He told Bar­bara Wal­ters this dur­ing an inter­view on “The View”.

When host Bar­bara Wal­ters — men­tion­ing rumors that Google Inc, Microsoft Corp and Apple Inc might be inter­ested in acquir­ing the com­pany — asked whether Twit­ter is for sale, Stone answered, “no.”

I truly hope that they never cave to pres­sure to “sell out” to the “big” guys.  That’s what makes Twit­ter so unique and so pop­u­lar in my opin­ion.  It is its own island in a large ocean of social media.  Big­ger is not always bet­ter.  I feel that if Twit­ter were to sell out to Microsoft, Google, or Apple, we might start to see large adver­tise­ments pop­ping up in the header, side­bars, and footer of the page, slow­ing down the per­for­mance of the site.  I don’t know about you, but that would prob­a­bly cause me to stop using the service.

Appar­ently Twit­ter does plan to mon­e­tize its ser­vice this year.   I’m not sure what that will entail, but hope­fully it won’t involve huge ban­ner ads.  Sure, I know that com­pa­nies need to make money, and I hope the founders of Twit­ter are mak­ing lots of money.  But I digress…

Good answer, Biz Stone.  I’m glad you’re not sell­ing.  I’m anx­ious to see what changes will be com­ing and ser­vices you’re plan­ning to offer, and I look for­ward to see­ing what the future holds for Twitter.

Source:  Reuters

Facebook changes its tune regarding Terms of Use

Well, appar­ently there was enough stink made about the “eter­nal license” for user con­tent in Facebook’s Terms of Use that they have decided to return to the pre­vi­ous version.

Over the past cou­ple of days, we have received a lot of ques­tions and com­ments about these updated terms and what they mean for peo­ple and their infor­ma­tion,” read the state­ment, which Face­book Chief Exec­u­tive Mark Zucker­berg expanded upon in a blog post. “Because of the feed­back we received, we have decided to return to our pre­vi­ous Terms of Use while we resolve the issues that peo­ple have raised.”

I believe this is a smart move by Face­book execs, because I’m sure alot of users were think­ing about ditch­ing the ser­vice.  (I know I was.)  The way the Terms were worded seemed to be a major breach in pri­vacy rights afforded the user.  This is a con­tro­ver­sial area, rel­a­tively still uncharted ter­ri­to­ries, and as such needs to be approached prag­mat­i­cally and with the fore­most con­cern for rights to privacy.

[Zuckerberg] added that the com­pany would work on a “sub­stan­tial revi­sion” of the terms and give Face­book users a role in craft­ing it by voic­ing their opin­ions through a group on its Web site, “Face­book Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.”

I like the idea of a “Face­book Bill of Rights” - it will go a long way in defin­ing how social media net­work­ing sites approach user con­tent.  User con­tent should be treated with the utmost respect; how­ever, it is the user’s ulti­mate respon­si­bil­ity to pro­tect his or her own pri­vacy.  Users should not put any­thing on a social net­work­ing site that they don’t want the gen­eral pub­lic hav­ing knowl­edge of.

Source:  Wall Street Journal

Palin E-mail Hacker Found

Jus­tice at last; actu­ally, it didn’t take long.  Accord­ing to TG Daily, the FBI was able to use proxy server logs to track down the hacker.  Get this — the hacker is a Ten­nessee uni­ver­sity col­lege stu­dent and the son of Rep­re­sen­ta­tive Mike Ker­nell (D-TN).  Big sur­prise, huh?

A few days ago, some­one going by the name of “Rubico” gloated on
4chan.org that he man­aged to hack into Sarah Palin’s Yahoo account.  He
forced a pass­word reset by answer­ing ques­tions about Palin’s birth­date,
zip code and where she met her spouse, Wasilla High School.   Of
course, by being the Repub­li­can can­di­date for Vice Pres­i­dent, this
infor­ma­tion is all very eas­ily found on the Inter­net.  After answer­ing
the ques­tions, Rubico reset the pass­word to “pop­corn” and read through
Palin’s emails.

I just think that it’s hilar­i­ous that the guy felt like he needed to brag about it.  That was his colos­sally stu­pid move.  And now, that brag­ging will lead to this guy’s arrest, con­vic­tion, and impris­on­ment.  Just one ques­tion — Was it worth it, Kernell?

Comment Policy: Should all blogs have one?

I just recently added a com­ment pol­icy to the blog.  I have noticed an increas­ing num­ber of blogs have started adding com­ment poli­cies, rules, and dis­clo­sures.  So when I see this trend, the first ques­tions to pop into my mind are:  Are com­ment poli­cies really nec­es­sary, and should all blogs have them?

I believe the answers to those ques­tions are “yes”.  Here is why I feel com­ment poli­cies are important:

1.  Com­mon sense no longer exists.  There are peo­ple out there that, no mat­ter what we (blog­gers) think, have no decency about them.  They exist for one rea­son only:  to “flame” your blog.  I have seen it in the past on dif­fer­ent blogs, be they polit­i­cal, reli­gious, or just a per­sonal jour­nal.  Some­one out there in the big ‘ol blo­gos­phere is going to make it his or her life’s mis­sion to dis­par­age, demean and har­rass you.

2.  Self-preservation is the key.  Pro­tect your­self.  This is one thing I learned from Word­Camp Dal­las back in March, thanks to Jonathan Bai­ley from Pla­gia­rism Today.  Com­ments, whether you like or not, become a part of your blog once it is posted.  Although it may not reflect your views, the com­ment can reflect on you and your blog.  Com­ments can either attract more read­er­ship or drive your loyal read­er­ship (as well as any new read­ers) far, far away.  That is why I am a strong pro­po­nent of com­ment mod­er­a­tion.  Let the first post (or few posts) of some­one you don’t know be mod­er­ated, then after you have deemed them “safe” the com­ments auto­mat­i­cally appear on your blog.  If some­one is offended by a com­ment on your blog, you could poten­tially be held respon­si­ble or even sued.  It’s been known to hap­pen.  I believe it is nec­es­sary to add a blurb like “The author of the blog is not respon­si­ble for the con­tent in the com­ments sec­tion.  The com­ments in no way reflect the posi­tions or the views of the blog author.”

3.  It looks pro­fes­sional.  Oh yeah.  It adds a lit­tle bit of cre­dence to your blog, and it makes your blog look like it’s a bona fide jour­nal­ism out­let.  In short, it just looks cool.

So what do you think?  Should all blogs have a com­ment pol­icy?  Fire away in the comments!

Google Chrome: A shiny new choice

Google is branch­ing out:  they announced their beta release of Google Chrome — their new browser — today.  I have just down­loaded it and will be test­ing it out.  I’ll also be post­ing my review later on of the beta release.

So, if you want to try it out, too, go down­load it here.