We should not be in Libya

Don’t get me wrong.  I want to see Muam­mar Al-Gaddafi ousted from power.  He is a ter­ror­ist; he appar­ently ordered the Pan Am 103 bomb­ing in 1988 that killed 190 Amer­i­cans.  How­ever, our cur­rent lead­er­ship obvi­ously has no clear strat­egy or man­date for what they’re doing now.  It’s not our place to be the police force for the world.  As good as it sounds, we can’t install democ­ra­cies in every coun­try around the world.  We have to take care of our own house first.

Also, Iraq and Afghanistan.  The Iraq War of 2003, although it was done with good inten­tions and with coali­tion sup­port, was based off of flawed intel­li­gence.  All of the lead­ers of this coun­try, both Repub­li­can and Democrat, at the time appar­ently had the same intel­li­gence — Sad­dam Hus­sein had weapons of mass destruc­tion and must be removed from power.  I have no doubt he did have WMDs.  It’s widely known that he used mus­tard gas on his own peo­ple in 1988.  How­ever, as much as I agreed with Saddam’s oustal and sup­ported it at the time, it was han­dled wrongly.

Afghanistan in 2001 was the war we should have fought and should still be fight­ing.  We have to make sure that the Tal­iban is routed and Al Qaeda can never go back there and use Afghanistan as a base of oper­a­tions.  It is para­mount that Al Qaeda, and par­tic­u­larly Osama Bin Laden, never see the light of day again.

Those two con­flicts, in which we are still engaged, should be our pri­mary focus still.  Libya is yet another front we can ill afford.  This is one case where I say let our allies (Great Britain, France, et. al.)  han­dle it for once.  Let’s get our sol­diers in Iraq and Afghanistan through with their mis­sion and home before we open up another war front.

Could Mexico be next?

In case you haven’t seen this list, for­mer CIA chief Michael Hay­den left a “list” of the United States’ top con­cerns for 2009 for his suc­ces­sor, new CIA chief Leon Panetta.  The list is as following:

  1. Al Qaeda
  2. Vio­lence in Mexico
  3. Iran’s Nuclear Program
  4. Europe and the War on Terror
  5. Insta­bil­ity caused by the low price of oil
  6. Pak­istan
  7. Afghanistan
  8. North Korea
  9. China
  10. The Mid­dle East

Now this list sur­prised me.  I hon­estly thought Pak­istan and/or the Mid­dle East would have been in the top five.  I knew Mex­ico was dire, but I didn’t think it would be num­ber two.  This tells me one thing:  We (the United States) could have to step in to help Mex­ico fight the drug car­tels before year’s end.  We cer­tainly can­not afford to let their cen­tral gov­ern­ment fall.  Then noth­ing would stop the drug run­ners from com­ing into Texas or Cal­i­for­nia, if they’re not already here.

This just makes secur­ing the bor­der all the more cru­cial.  We must increase the num­ber of bor­der patrol agents and increase the length of the fence.  I know we can’t real­is­ti­cally do this by the end of the year, but I also know that 700 miles of fence won’t pro­tect us, either.  I know, I know…we can’t afford it.  We’re hav­ing a finan­cial melt­down.  But it would be absolutely dev­as­tat­ing to our econ­omy if Mex­ico fails.  We would have mil­lions, MILLIONS of refugees flee­ing if the Mex­i­can gov­ern­ment col­lapses.  Let’s just pray that doesn’t happen.