Student wins suit against Anti-Creationism Teacher




Believe it or not, a judge in Cal­i­for­nia actu­ally ruled that a teacher vio­lated the First Amend­ment by call­ing cre­ation­ism “super­sti­tious nonsense”.

U.S. Dis­trict Judge James Selna issued the rul­ing Fri­day after a 16-month legal bat­tle between stu­dent Chad Far­nan and his for­mer teacher, James Corbett.

Far­nan sued in U.S. Dis­trict Court in 2007, alleg­ing that Cor­bett vio­lated the estab­lish­ment clause of the First Amend­ment by mak­ing repeated com­ments in class that were hos­tile to Chris­t­ian beliefs.

Appar­ently the teacher made 20 state­ments in a sin­gle day against Chris­t­ian beliefs, and the stu­dent recorded every sin­gle one of them.  But, dur­ing the course of the trial, most of the state­ments were ruled not against the First Amend­ment.  How­ever, the one state­ment where the teacher said cre­ation­ism was “reli­gious, super­sti­tious non­sense” vio­lated Chad Farnan’s rights.  Here’s some of the other state­ments this teacher made:

When you put on your Jesus glasses, you can’t see the truth.

Con­ser­v­a­tives don’t want women to avoid preg­nan­cies — that’s inter­fer­ing with God’s work.

When you pray for Divine inter­ven­tion, you’re hop­ing that the spaghetti mon­ster will help you get what you want.

These state­ments show just how igno­rant this teacher really is, and it also shows his absolute hatred of Chris­tian­ity.  I’m glad the stu­dent won his case, and this should pro­vide prece­dent for future cases of reli­gious intol­er­ance.  As one of our found­ing fathers said:

Among the most ines­timable of our bless­ings, also, is that… of lib­erty to wor­ship our Cre­ator in the way we think most agree­able to His will; a lib­erty deemed in other coun­tries incom­pat­i­ble with good gov­ern­ment and yet proved by our expe­ri­ence to be its best support.

–Thomas Jef­fer­son in reply to John Thomas et. al., 1807.

Source:  Fox News

Related Posts: